Shin, H., Hansen, K. U. & Jiao, F. Techno-economic assessment of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis. Nat. Sustain. 4, 911–919 (2021).
Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).
Masel, R. I. et al. An industrial perspective on catalysts for low-temperature CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 118–128 (2021).
Ozden, A. et al. Carbon-efficient carbon dioxide electrolysers. Nat. Sustain. 5, 563–573 (2022).
Wakerley, D. et al. Gas diffusion electrodes, reactor designs and key metrics of low-temperature CO2 electrolysers. Nat. Energy 7, 130–143 (2022).
Gabardo, C. M. et al. Continuous carbon dioxide electroreduction to concentrated multi-carbon products using a membrane electrode assembly. Joule 3, 2777–2791 (2019).
Rabiee, H. et al. Gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and dinitrogen to value-added products: a review. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 1959–2008 (2021).
Ge, L. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction in membrane-electrode assemblies. Chem 8, 663–692 (2022).
de Sousa, L., Benes, N. E. & Mul, G. Evaluating the effects of membranes, cell designs, and flow configurations on the performance of Cu-GDEs in converting CO2 to CO. ACS EST Eng. 2, 2034–2042 (2022).
Endrődi, B. et al. High carbonate ion conductance of a robust PiperION membrane allows industrial current density and conversion in a zero-gap carbon dioxide electrolyzer cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4098–4105 (2020).
Liu, Z., Yang, H., Kutz, R. & Masel, R. I. CO2 electrolysis to CO and O2 at high selectivity, stability and efficiency using sustainion membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, J3371 (2018).
Li, J. et al. Constraining CO coverage on copper promotes high-efficiency ethylene electroproduction. Nat. Catal. 2, 1124–1131 (2019).
Wu, M. et al. Sequential *CO management via controlling in situ reconstruction for efficient industrial-current-density CO2-to-C2+ electroreduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2302851120 (2023).
García de Arquer, F. P. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm−2. Science 367, 661–666 (2020).
Möller, T. et al. The product selectivity zones in gas diffusion electrodes during the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5995–6006 (2021).
Ma, M. et al. Insights into the carbon balance for CO2 electroreduction on Cu using gas diffusion electrode reactor designs. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 977–985 (2020).
Nwabara, U. O. et al. Towards accelerated durability testing protocols for CO2 electrolysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 22557–22571 (2020).
Popović, S. et al. Stability and degradation mechanisms of copper-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 14736–14746 (2020).
Wu, Y. et al. Mitigating electrolyte flooding for electrochemical CO2 reduction via infiltration of hydrophobic particles in a gas diffusion layer. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 2884–2892 (2022).
Yang, K., Kas, R., Smith, W. A. & Burdyny, T. Role of the carbon-based gas diffusion layer on flooding in a gas diffusion electrode cell for electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 33–40 (2021).
Cofell, E. R., Nwabara, U. O., Bhargava, S. S., Henckel, D. E. & Kenis, P. J. A. Investigation of electrolyte-dependent carbonate formation on gas diffusion electrodes for CO2 electrolysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 15132–15142 (2021).
Vass, Á., Kormányos, A., Kószó, Z., Endrődi, B. & Janáky, C. Anode catalysts in CO2 electrolysis: challenges and untapped opportunities. ACS Catal. 12, 1037–1051 (2022).
Liu, M. et al. The capping agent is the key: structural alterations of Ag NPs during CO2 electrolysis probed in a zero-gap gas-flow configuration. J. Catal. 404, 371–382 (2021).
Garg, S. et al. How alkali cations affect salt precipitation and CO2 electrolysis performance in membrane electrode assembly electrolyzers. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 1631–1643 (2023).
Xu, Q. et al. Identifying and alleviating the durability challenges in membrane-electrode-assembly devices for high-rate CO electrolysis. Nat. Catal. 6, 1042–1051 (2023).
Moss, A. et al. In operando investigations of oscillatory water and carbonate effects in MEA-based CO2 electrolysis devices. Joule 7, 350–365 (2022).
Martens, I., Chattot, R. & Drnec, J. Decoupling catalyst aggregation, ripening, and coalescence processes inside operating fuel cells. J. Power Sources 521, 230851 (2022).
Dorofeev, G. A., Streletskii, A. N., Povstugar, I. V., Protasov, A. V. & Elsukov, E. P. Determination of nanoparticle sizes by X-ray diffraction. Colloid J. 74, 675–685 (2012).
Martens, I. et al. X-ray transparent proton-exchange membrane fuel cell design for in situ wide and small angle scattering tomography. J. Power Sources 437, 226906 (2019).
Aßmann, P., Gago, A. S., Gazdzicki, P., Friedrich, K. A. & Wark, M. Toward developing accelerated stress tests for proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 21, 225–233 (2020).
Li, D. et al. Durability of anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3393–3419 (2021).
Xu, Y. et al. Self-cleaning CO2 reduction systems: unsteady electrochemical forcing enables stability. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 809–815 (2021).
Disch, J., Bohn, L., Metzler, L. & Vierrath, S. Strategies for the mitigation of salt precipitation in zero-gap CO2 electrolyzers producing CO. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 7344–7357 (2023).
Joensen, B. Ó. et al. Unveiling transport mechanisms of cesium and water in operando zero-gap CO2 electrolyzers. Joule 8, 1754–1771 (2024).
Ma, M., Zheng, Z., Yan, W., Hu, C. & Seger, B. Rigorous evaluation of liquid products in high-rate CO2/CO electrolysis. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 2595–2601 (2022).
Xu, Q. et al. Enriching surface-accessible CO2 in the zero-gap anion-exchange-membrane-based CO2 electrolyzer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202214383 (2022).
Zeradjanin, A. R., Narangoda, P., Spanos, I., Masa, J. & Schlögl, R. How to minimise destabilising effect of gas bubbles on water splitting electrocatalysts? Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 30, 100797 (2021).
Graedel, T. E. Corrosion mechanisms for silver exposed to the atmosphere. J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 1963 (1992).
Sachan, R. et al. Oxidation-resistant silver nanostructures for ultrastable plasmonic applications. Adv. Mater. 25, 2045–2050 (2013).
Lu, X. et al. In situ observation of the pH gradient near the gas diffusion electrode of CO2 reduction in alkaline electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15438–15444 (2020).
Back, S., Yeom, M. S. & Jung, Y. Active sites of Au and Ag nanoparticle catalysts for CO2 electroreduction to CO. ACS Catal. 5, 5089–5096 (2015).
Clark, E. L. et al. Influence of atomic surface structure on the activity of Ag for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO. ACS Catal. 9, 4006–4014 (2019).
Chen, X. et al. Simultaneous SAXS/WAXS/UV–vis study of the nucleation and growth of nanoparticles: a test of classical nucleation theory. Langmuir 31, 11678–11691 (2015).
Kuhl, K. P. et al. Electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to methane and methanol on transition metal surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14107–14113 (2014).
Cofell, E. R. et al. Potential cycling of silver cathodes in an alkaline CO2 flow electrolyzer for accelerated stress testing and carbonate inhibition. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5, 12013–12021 (2022).
Moss, A. et al. Versatile high energy X-ray transparent electrolysis cell for operando measurements. J. Power Sources 562, 232754 (2022).
Ashiotis, G. et al. The fast azimuthal integration Python library: pyFAI. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 510–519 (2015).
Kieffer, J. & Karkoulis, D. PyFAI, a versatile library for azimuthal regrouping. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 425, 202012 (2013).
Jinschek, J. R. & Helveg, S. Image resolution and sensitivity in an environmental transmission electron microscope. Micron 43, 1156–1168 (2012).
